Biografía
MCPA-Level-1模擬対策問題、MCPA-Level-1試験勉強過去問
MCPA-Level-1実践資料は、これらのMCPA-Level-1実践資料を説明責任を持って作成した当社のものです。 また、MCPA-Level-1トレーニング資料は効率的な製品です。 さらに、MCPA-Level-1試験準備は適切で立派な練習資料です。 進捗状況を確認し、MCPA-Level-1トレーニング資料の証明書を取得することは、当然のことながら、最新かつ最も正確な知識を備えた最も専門的な専門家によるものです。 MCPA-Level-1試験準備は市場の大部分を占めています。
MuleSoft MCPA-Level-1認定試験は、MuleSoft Anypoint Platformの深い理解を持つことを求められる厳しい試験です。試験は、MuleSoft Anypoint Platformを使用して複雑な統合プロジェクトを設計および実装する能力をテストするように設計されています。試験に合格するためには、MuleSoft Anypoint Platformでの実務経験が必要です。
MCPA-LEVEL-1認定試験は、MulesoftのAnyPointプラットフォームを使用して統合ソリューションの設計、開発、展開に関与している専門家に最適です。この認定は、個人が統合アーキテクチャと設計の分野で専門知識を実証するのに役立ち、雇用市場の競争力を提供します。クラウドベースのテクノロジーの採用の増加と統合の専門家に対する需要の高まりにより、MCPA-Level-1認定を取得することで、専門家のキャリアの見通しを大幅に向上させることができます。
>> MCPA-Level-1模擬対策問題 <<
MCPA-Level-1試験勉強過去問 & MCPA-Level-1試験番号
JPTestKingはMuleSoftのMCPA-Level-1認定試験に受かりたい各受験生に明確かつ顕著なソリューションを提供しました。当社はMuleSoftのMCPA-Level-1認定試験の詳しい問題と解答を提供します。当社のIT専門家が最も経験と資格があるプロな人々で、我々が提供したテストの問題と解答は実際の認定試験と殆ど同じです。これは本当に素晴らしいことです。それにもっと大切なのは、JPTestKingのサイトは世界的でMCPA-Level-1試験トレーニングによっての試験合格率が一番高いです。
Mulesoft MCPA-LEVEL-1認定は、Mulesoft認定プラットフォームアーキテクト-レベル1のスキルと知識を検証するように設計されています。この認定は、MulesoftのAnyPointプラットフォームを使用して統合ソリューションの設計、構築、展開の経験がある個人を対象としています。 MCPA-LEVEL-1認定試験では、AnyPointプラットフォームのアーキテクチャ、MulesoftのApipeid Connectivityアプローチ、AnyPoint Studioを使用したAPIの構築と設計など、Mulesoftのさまざまな側面に関する候補者の理解をテストします。
MuleSoft Certified Platform Architect - Level 1 認定 MCPA-Level-1 試験問題 (Q85-Q90):
質問 # 85
A team is planning to enhance an Experience API specification, and they are following API-led connectivity design principles.
What is their motivation for enhancing the API?
- A. The primary API consumer wants certain kinds of endpoints changed from the Center for Enablement standard to the consumer system standard
- B. The underlying System API is updated to provide more detailed data for several heavily used resources
- C. A Canonical Data Model is being adopted that impacts several types of data included in the API
- D. An IP Allowlist policy is being added to the API instances in the Development and Staging environments
正解：C
解説：
In API-led design, an Experience API is enhanced to improve how data is delivered to end-user applications.
One primary reason to enhance an Experience API is when new data standards, such as a Canonical Data Model, are adopted. Here's why:
* Canonical Data Model (CDM):
* Adopting a CDM standardizes data representations across the organization, making APIs more consistent and easier to consume across various services and applications.
* Updating the Experience API ensures that it delivers data in this standardized format, improving interoperability and reusability.
* Explanation of Correct Answer (D):
* A CDM impacts the structure and types of data the API provides, and this update would be directly relevant to an Experience API, as it is the primary point of interaction for applications.
* Explanation of Incorrect Options:
* Option A involves adapting to consumer-specific standards, which is against API-led design principles.
* Option B involves changes in System APIs, which don't directly mandate changes to the Experience API unless data formatting adjustments are required.
* Option C (IP Allowlist) relates to security rather than API design and would not motivate a functional enhancement of the API.
ReferencesFor more details on the use of Canonical Data Models in API-led architecture, refer to MuleSoft's guidelines on data standardization and Experience API best practices.
質問 # 86
When using CloudHub with the Shared Load Balancer, what is managed EXCLUSIVELY by the API implementation (the Mule application) and NOT by Anypoint Platform?
- A. The logging configuration that enables log entries to be visible in Runtime Manager
- B. The assignment of each HTTP request to a particular CloudHub worker
- C. The SSL certificates used by the API implementation to expose HTTPS endpoints
- D. The number of DNS entries allocated to the API implementation
正解：C
解説：
Correct answer: The SSL certificates used by the API implementation to expose HTTPS endpoints
*****************************************
>> The assignment of each HTTP request to a particular CloudHub worker is taken care by Anypoint Platform itself. We need not manage it explicitly in the API implementation and in fact we CANNOT manage it in the API implementation.
>> The logging configuration that enables log entries to be visible in Runtime Manager is ALWAYS managed in the API implementation and NOT just for SLB. So this is not something we do EXCLUSIVELY when using SLB.
>> We DO NOT manage the number of DNS entries allocated to the API implementation inside the code. Anypoint Platform takes care of this.
It is the SSL certificates used by the API implementation to expose HTTPS endpoints that is to be managed EXCLUSIVELY by the API implementation. Anypoint Platform does NOT do this when using SLBs.
質問 # 87
What is true about automating interactions with Anypoint Platform using tools such as Anypoint Platform REST APIs, Anypoint CU, or the Mule Maven plugin?
- A. By default, the Anypoint CLI and Mule Maven plugin are NOT included in the Mule runtime, so are NOT available to be used by deployed Mule applications
- B. Anypoint Platform APIs can ONLY automate interactions with CloudHub, while the Mule Maven plugin is required for deployment to customer-hosted Mule runtimes
- C. Access to Anypoint Platform APIs and Anypoint CU can be controlled separately through the roles and permissions in Anypoint Platform, so that specific users can get access to Anypoint CLI white others get access to the platform APIs
- D. API policies can be applied to the Anypoint Platform APIs so that ONLY certain LOBs have access to specific functions
正解：A
質問 # 88
Version 3.0.1 of a REST API implementation represents time values in PST time using ISO 8601 hh:mm:ss format. The API implementation needs to be changed to instead represent time values in CEST time using ISO 8601 hh:mm:ss format. When following the semver.org semantic versioning specification, what version should be assigned to the updated API implementation?
- A. 3.0.2
- B. 4.0.0
- C. 3.0.1
- D. 3.1.0
正解：B
解説：
Correct answer: 4.0.0
*****************************************
As per semver.org semantic versioning specification:
Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the:
- MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes.
- MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards compatible manner.
- PATCH version when you make backwards compatible bug fixes.
As per the scenario given in the question, the API implementation is completely changing its behavior. Although the format of the time is still being maintained as hh:mm:ss and there is no change in schema w.r.t format, the API will start functioning different after this change as the times are going to come completely different.
Example: Before the change, say, time is going as 09:00:00 representing the PST. Now on, after the change, the same time will go as 18:00:00 as Central European Summer Time is 9 hours ahead of Pacific Time.
>> This may lead to some uncertain behavior on API clients depending on how they are handling the times in the API response. All the API clients need to be informed that the API functionality is going to change and will return in CEST format. So, this considered as a MAJOR change and the version of API for this new change would be 4.0.0
質問 # 89
A System API is designed to retrieve data from a backend system that has scalability challenges. What API policy can best safeguard the backend system?
- A. IPwhitelist
- B. SLA-based rate limiting
- C. Auth 2 token enforcement
- D. Client ID enforcement
正解：B
解説：
SLA-based rate limiting
*****************************************
>> Client Id enforement policy is a "Compliance" related NFR and does not help in maintaining the "Quality of Service (QoS)". It CANNOT and NOT meant for protecting the backend systems from scalability challenges.
>> IP Whitelisting and OAuth 2.0 token enforcement are "Security" related NFRs and again does not help in maintaining the "Quality of Service (QoS)". They CANNOT and are NOT meant for protecting the backend systems from scalability challenges.
Rate Limiting, Rate Limiting-SLA, Throttling, Spike Control are the policies that are "Quality of Service (QOS)" related NFRs and are meant to help in protecting the backend systems from getting overloaded.
https://dzone.com/articles/how-to-secure-apis
質問 # 90
......
MCPA-Level-1試験勉強過去問: https://www.jptestking.com/MCPA-Level-1-exam.html
